Traditional Coding Vs. Low-Code: Which One Works Better For Your Business

Why is low coding preferred over traditional coding? What is the difference between a Low-code and Traditional development? Well, these are the questions running around your head when developing your business. 

Low-code platforms and traditional coding often overlap within the same workflows. Moreover, Traditional programming is time-consuming and costly for an organization. On the other hand, low code has simplified interfaces and helps users build apps with minimal coding.

Both coding developments have differences, but combining them benefits the organization. Here, in this blog, we will be discussing low code and traditional coding are different and look at the benefits of using them. 

Understanding low-code and traditional development

It is necessary to look at the pros and cons of low-code and traditional development to understand which software is better for an organization. But what are low-code development and traditional development?

Low code is the visual development approach to application development and uses drag-and-drop components, model-driven logic, a user-friendly interface, etc. On the other hand, traditional software application development is on writing code using programming languages. 

Pros of Traditional coding

Deploying a few reasons why traditional or high code wins the race over low code development:

• Custom mode:

In Traditional development, you are free to choose the technology, tools, APIs, etc., required to create the desired app. The applications developed using a traditional approach can be deployed to any destinations that developers choose to support for operations. Also, you can create custom code and build applications without any limitations. 

• Better control:

The traditional coding system benefits from better control, and users can control their application structure and code writing. Thus, it has flexibility factors and better control features where well-designed applications can be accomplished using any programming language and development platform.

• Smooth Development Process:

Traditional development software ensures the building of custom applications while enabling the application to be seamlessly updated, easily maintained, released to the public, etc. It has a mainframe environment and a client environment, which offer better control to the developers.

Cons of traditional coding

The cons of traditional coding and the reason behind the existence of low-code platforms: 

• Requires in-depth knowledge:

Traditional coding development requires programmers with good coding skills and in-depth knowledge of building a successful app. Also, developers must know programming languages or development platforms. However, 43% of people do not have knowledge about low-code platforms. 

• Costly:

Traditional coding development is expensive. It takes time, effort, resources, etc., to develop a good software application and has many development processes, which include developers, designers, testers, and many others. Thus, it is costlier than Low-code platforms.

• Long development possess:

There is no drag-and-drop option in the traditional development platforms. It is a 100% manual coding platform; thus, its application is developed from scratch. It takes a lot of time for the development process, which is the main disadvantage of the platform. 

Pros of low code development

Here are the reasons why low code development gained attention in the competitive business space: 

• Easy development:

Unlike traditional development, it eliminates some manual programming work and allows programmers to build apps faster using a visual modeling approach. Also, the global study indicated that low-code application development software is 40-60% faster than traditional development.

• Does not require core knowledge:

Like traditional development requires in-depth knowledge, the low-code development process does not require core knowledge. Thus, it helped people who don’t know how to code or have little knowledge about building apps.

• Cost-efficient development:

In a traditional coding system, you must form an in-house team or outsource software development platforms for application development. Still, in low code development, you can code and build applications yourself; thus, it helps businesses deliver applications at a lower cost than traditional software development.

Cons of low code development 

Along with benefits, low code has some limitations, and it is as follows:

• Quality issues:

The apps built using the low code may perform differently than a well-designed application created using a traditional approach. The auto-generated code supports various platforms and uses cases, not team-specific developments.

• Few custom modes:

Unlike traditional approaches, low code development platforms offer limited opportunities to customize an application or control its functions. Also, it deploys applications to certain platforms and specific cloud systems. 

• Security concerns and poor UI:

One of the significant security concerns is that reliable low-code platforms automatically install updates and patches and eliminate the security fixes that require a developer to implement for developing an application. 

However, low-code platforms provide templates, widgets, UI components, etc., that allow designing apps fast. Though it sounds beneficial, low-code UI design does not offer unique or 

customized modes.

Use cases for low-code vs. traditional development

One of the best ways to know which one is better development software is don’t choose When to use a low-code platform or a traditional platform. Instead, find the balance between the two platforms and determine where it incorporates efficiently into your workflows. Now, let’s look into some common use cases where low-code approaches over traditional development:

• Easy integration:

Using low-code tools, it is easy to integrate an application with external tools or platforms. But in the case of the traditional development process, the integration of applications is complex. However, low code and conventional innovation are projected to be adopted by 75% of businesses.

• Simple websites:

Simple websites do not require hand-write HTML, PHP, CSS code, etc., and consist of static content. It uses simple drag-and-drop tools and builds websites quickly. So, in that case, low code development is beneficial over traditional development. 

• Business analytics:

The low code development process helps build dashboards or reporting tools that support business analytics and help businesses to make data-driven decisions. Also, many business process management platforms offer integrated low-code tools for business analytics and compete in complicated market systems. 

• Business processes:

It is ideal for simple business processes, including customer data collection, vendor contract approvals, etc. Thus, low code platform integrations in Business process management platforms make app building easy for people with little knowledge about coding and programming platforms. 

When to use a traditional development system:

There are some use cases of traditional development systems to look upon while choosing the best development software: 

• Security: 

Low code development systems are not developed according to strict security standards like traditional development software. Also, it becomes more difficult to enhance the security concerns of low-code applications as source code is buried under the low-code abstractions. That is why traditional development systems are used to enhance security and eliminate the risks of applications. 

• Performance:

Low-code applications do not deliver performance due to the limited customized features. Drag and drop tools, the inbuilt library may sound boon but it disrupts the application operation. Thus, it is likely to deliver a lower degree of performance. So, to top performance, you must optimize every line of code using a traditional development approach.

• Lock-in factor:

Depending on low-code development may lead developers at high risk in developing applications. They get locked into a particular low-code platform ecosystem and can only deploy to environments supported by the platform. But with the traditional coding system, developers can easily migrate the codebase to a different application platform or lock it in a certain environment. 

• Maintainability:

If vendors discontinue using the low-code tools to develop an app, maintenance becomes a challenge over a long time. However, it does not offer maintenance challenges and application integration issues if you continue using traditional development methods. 

Can Low-Code and Traditional Development Be Used Together?

It is not true that low-code development platforms were introduced to uproot and replace traditional programming from its comfort zone in every digital project of an organization. However, the low-code and traditional development systems make a great pair combined and bring significant business value.

Mixing these two software development approaches can enable many features to look upon, and here it goes

• Focus on complex software development:

Traditional software development is known for building complex applications. However, businesses still use it for designing complex and integrated software for business operations. 

But, it is replaced by a drag-and-drop interface of low-code platforms, which helps manage and process data. 

• Faster time-to-market and optimization:

The software, low code, and traditional development result in faster time-to-market and data optimization. It also enables organizations to accelerate development and limit the costs of building applications.

Moreover, low code development establishes its core functionality, whereas programming teams develop its more complex and tailored functions.

• High-quality enterprise solutions:

High-quality enterprise solutions are the main advantages of combining low code platforms and traditional development systems. The low code system accelerates the development and launch of software and quickly fetches data from multiple data source integration. On the other side, the traditional system processes data and displays it on websites and mobile dashboards.

• Reporting and Monitoring:

Low-code apps and traditional developments are ideal for analytical purposes such as reporting and monitoring. It is useful to keep an eye on the performance of other apps and monitor workflows to keep track of their efficiency. Moreover, it helps business organizations to automate paper-based work and improve task workflow.

• Multi-device compatibility:

The most crucial feature of low-code platforms combined with traditional platforms is multi-device compatibility or cross-platform accessibility. However, low code is ideal for multi-device features, but traditional development removes security concerns and improves the UI environment. Thus, it enables integration with core systems and supports efficient cross-departmental operations.

• Out-of-the-box functionality:

Out-of-the-box or robust functionality eliminates the requirement to develop core modules from scratch for application design and development. The development system helps in data and customer service management, etc.

Low code vs. traditional coding:- what’s the difference?

There are numerous benefits of low code and traditional development software, but they have ample differences, which is why businesses need clarification on the two development software. Thus, consider the differences between low code vs. traditional development systems before choosing the ideal software for application development.

The difference between low code vs. traditional development systems is below.

	Traditional coding	Low code
Tools	Manual coding. Prototype revisions. Testing and fixing bugs.	No extensive coding. In-built design templates. Drag-and-drop tools.
Custom mode	Unlimited and applications should be developed separately for each platform.	Limited custom mode and does not require a separate development process for running on different platforms.
Speed factor	Requires many steps and resources. Slow and complex. Developed in a matter of months.	One-touch deployment to multiple platforms Simple and fast. Developed in a matter of weeks.
Coding knowledge	In-depth knowledge of programming language. Requires advanced programming skills.	Minimum knowledge of programming language. Does not require advanced programming skills.
Scope	Full-scale development and build for multiple business needs.	Built for specific business needs at a time.
Scalability	High scalability factor	Limited scalability factor
Cost	Since the application is developed from scratch, the cost is high	The development cost is low. Only need to pay for access and minimal labor
Performance	The performance level is high due to complex functioning features.	The performance is standard due to the poor interface.
Maintenance factor	It requires additional development and extensive support.	It is easy to update and extend and suitable for prototyping.

Traditional development and low code development: The crown of business 

The choice of the Low code platform vs. traditional development depends on the business requirements. The combination of low code and traditional development has taken the crown of innovating, delivering, and accelerating functionalities and features for application development. 

Nonetheless, the combination has created new potential concerning application delivery that seemed impossible before. Low-code development saves time and improves agility, whereas traditional coding facilitates freedom and flexibility. 

Thus, it benefits businesses in bespoke solutions and tailoring their websites and applications for defining a company’s success path. 

Lastly, to become a business, contact the Parangat team, who are skilled professionals to help your business with websites.